
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
latest_posts
- 1
RFK Jr. says he's following 'gold standard' science. Here's what to know - 2
\Step by step instructions to Pick the Best Material Organization for Your Home\ - 3
Pfizer in $41.5 million settlement with Texas over ADHD drug for children - 4
NASA astronauts to return from space early due to an 'unexpected medical issue.' What happened — and when are they coming home? - 5
Washington resident contracts bird flu, first human case in U.S. since February
The most effective method to Shake Hands Expertly: A Bit by bit Guide
Manual for Picking Coastline Travel
Health Rounds: Regeneron drug wipes out residual multiple myeloma cells in small trial
Careful Nurturing: Techniques for Bringing up Tough Children
Artemis II astronauts race to set a new distance record from Earth and behold the moon's far side
Zelensky warns of imminent massive Russian attack on Ukraine
How federal officials talk about health is shifting in troubling ways – and that change makes me worried for my autistic child
In blow to Lula, Brazil Congress revives controversial environmental bill
Meet Beef the bulldog, who takes slow walks with his 78-year-old friend













